- Parts of this English version of this website was automatically translated. We are improving the translation every day. Please register to our forum and our hiking expert will love to answer any of your questions there -
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Guest  
#1 Posted : Saturday, March 24, 2012 2:56:28 PM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 5/6/2016(UTC)
Posts: 6,724

Light weight hiking shoe, light yet tough.
A GoreTex membrane to complete water tightness.
Vibram soles.
42 scale.
Wide gives a dummy. easy walking.
Was bought two weeks ago, one of the four days I realized that little one.
Very rstilit shoe is suitable for easy day trips and long walks.
Sold in stores. At 500. Comes with the box of course.

Nebo
Neto.gusto.wol@gmail.com

Http://www.vasque.com/vasque-7466-vasque/shoe/7466-vasque breeze gtx-mens-taupe-burntorange.
Sponsor
Arik  
#2 Posted : Saturday, March 24, 2012 3:04:53 PM(UTC)
Arik

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0

Even the link lock is hiking and trekking category/kapking.

Suitable for walks on it.
arthur  
#3 Posted : Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:37:35 AM(UTC)
arthur

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 491

There is no connection between shoe category and duration of trip.


Besides ש"קטגוריות" thing like mountain shoes are pretty random whether to tell the truth. With so many variables that go into the equation, you can't say that's Slipper that fits to X and it's not. Arthur 40992.9021064815
Arik  
#4 Posted : Sunday, March 25, 2012 3:43:29 PM(UTC)
Arik

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0

And yet, when you say "road trip" refers to trek with a heavy backpack and day trip with easy.

Maybe a false category, let alone have to rely only on them, but they are still important as factory settings for that product.
Namely these categories refer to the shoe flexibility, shock absorbing (most relevant categories such as running and climbing) and foot grip.
If the manufacturer classifies heiking shoe, is not supposed to correspond to carrying a backpack with more than a day. Arik 40993.5325115741
זמי1  
#5 Posted : Sunday, March 25, 2012 4:25:45 PM(UTC)
זמי1

Rank: Newbie

Groups: מנהל כללי
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 4,934
Israel

I have this shoe, I respect, going with a backpack medium weight. Me and a few hundred miles the shoe doesn't fit. I need more rigid shoe to prevent tension on the Achilles tendon.

The inner lining begins to crumble and that disadvantage. A similar shoe soles and iberam, split after 600 miles in less than a year. Even where the inner lining is deteriorating.

Overall I am very satisfied with your footwear. But move for personal reasons as more rigid shoe n The upholstery was not significant because although I believe that this shoe is not life more than two years or 800 miles, whichever comes first.

It's a shoe that I think is suitable for mild to moderate path not provided rough terrain.

arthur  
#6 Posted : Sunday, March 25, 2012 10:38:06 PM(UTC)
arthur

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 491

[QUOTE = Arik] and yet, when you say "road trip" refers to trek with a heavy backpack and day trip with easy.

Maybe a false category, let alone have to rely only on them, but they are still important as factory settings for that product.
Namely these categories refer to the shoe flexibility, shock absorbing (most relevant categories such as running and climbing) and foot grip.
If the manufacturer classifies heiking shoe, is not supposed to correspond to carrying a backpack with more than a day.


I still don't agree.
Sightseeing can be done with a heavy backpack or knapsack super easy, and the concept itself of sightseeing is very flexible. For long?

When talking about shoe is more important the weights that the person is going to carry, terrain, soil type. Factual stuff.
Arik  
#7 Posted : Sunday, March 25, 2012 11:36:58 PM(UTC)
Arik

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0

[QUOTE = arthur]
I still don't agree.
Sightseeing can be done with a heavy backpack or knapsack super easy, and the concept itself of sightseeing is very flexible. For long?

When talking about shoe is more important the weights that the person is going to carry, terrain, soil type. Factual stuff.


That's what I said.
But as ad shmpersm writes "the shoe fits easy walks and longer" that include a Publisher this setting and context for such cases created categories (although generic, but provide some idea) such as "hiking".
oded  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, March 27, 2012 2:43:41 AM(UTC)
oded

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0

If you get back to the thread, I have experience with yoga.
Suitable for day trips in soft ground without much weight. Intensive (daily) walk without a lot of weight on last year and a half.
I think it is not suitable for long walks with plenty of weight on their backs.
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.