- Parts of this English version of this website was automatically translated. We are improving the translation every day. Please register to our forum and our hiking expert will love to answer any of your questions there -
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
איתי  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 2:32:01 AM(UTC)
איתי

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 465

Alon (a. lidor) asked me how I carry here the camera with me.

I think there were already discussions on this subject, but I'd love to hear new ideas.

In the past I would hook up the camera case's belt bag shtadrgati in April and now is too heavy for the stomach belt and therefore moved to strips of Backpack straps:



The vagina I Pod connector with 2 rings closed in this camera always accessible to photography and is relatively safe. Two major drawbacks in the shape of this awkwardness President (field of view towards the legs a bit limited) and chest ventilation.

This week in case I found an article that describes the shape of the President.
Sponsor
easyman  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 3:54:27 AM(UTC)
easyman

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0

Don't understand why you are carrying the large and heavy cameras.

When you take a small compact camera easy and definitely leave photos.

Easyman 41220.0450578704

איתי  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 9:10:16 AM(UTC)
איתי

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 465

There are certain things that people understand.
easyman  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 11:03:05 AM(UTC)
easyman

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0

We used to laugh at the Japanese if their big cameras filming everything.

Today the Israelis switched them and shoot every mosquito on theirpounds.

Miss for the cameras one session of littlecodec we shoot what you really need to shoot.

Travel is easy walking wise ... ULTRALIGHT.

Easyman 41220.3420486111

איתי  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 12:45:09 PM(UTC)
איתי

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 465

What you say. 41220.410150463 with me
יענקל'ה סער  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 1:19:41 PM(UTC)
YANKALE17

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 5,418
Man
Israel

Hear easy each what suits him and what he loves. As you rush to learn this rule will be better lives. I really understand me, I was just like him and everything

I had to photograph the closest, best and best camera. It is a pleasure. Only someone who was there between.

Travel smart is enjoying the trip.

Today I have a lot of fun to travel without having to shoot at all, so my first lmasa through Israel trail went without a camera.

If I shoot the day exploring that because my granddaughter that I travel on the trail.

Yankale17 41220.5607986111
a.lidor  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 6:13:18 PM(UTC)
a.lidor

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0

[QUOTE = easyman]

We used to laugh at the Japanese if their big cameras filming everything.

Today the Israelis switched them and shoot every mosquito on theirpounds.

Miss for the cameras one session of littlecodec we shoot what you really need to shoot.

Travel is easy walking wise ... ULTRALIGHT.

Well, first of all, not all travel made easy is a smart traveler and anyone who is not olteraliit is stupid. Some people think they have to take certain equipment or can/want to spend huge sums on olteraliit equipment

But about the cameras-even compare! With a compact camera can take great pictures, but it's a different world and whoever SLR photographed with both do not understand how ... Just one example, if you want to print a large image sensor size, then acting serious.

But the body of the message and to me:

This weekend I went for the first time on a trip with an SLR. I have no big SLR, Nikon D3100 with 18-55 lens (the Kit lens). Put the carrier on her chest, similar to what appears in the image (I had to have tweaked the shoulder straps, but that's exactly what I wanted to do ...).

My main problem was where I needed to climb or descend face to some rock-the camera really bother me and I had no choice but to cut it and transfer it to someone else, or to hang it with the strap on.

In addition there were the same problems of sweating and being unable to see your feet.

I did a Web search on the topic but I didn't see anything innovative looks better (actual think improvised kind of existing carrier one I saw ...).

I'd love to hear if anyone has really something more creative.

Yagil  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, November 7, 2012 8:37:49 PM(UTC)
Yagil

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0

The best solution I found was to use Backpack straps of the Op/Tech:
Http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/485766-REG/OP_TECH_USA_1301652_System_Connectors_Reporter_Backpack_Set_of.html
The disadvantage is that they are contradictory — each set including one male and female connector one. Da ' AQA, leash, standard Tamrac products, is with the same connection on both sides. What do I do? I bought two sets. Still not expensive.
Advantage-some parts, almost zero weight, not bad for the body that is attached at the chest. Never-released. No less important: the straps are attached to Greece only Backpack straps, chest straps potential friction as in others I tried: there is no part that goes under the straps and back casing.
The downside--if not matched him really good wholesale (wiggles that are connected only two points and no more; l'm not sure should release at least one strap before you can take that as it fastened to the immobility there is no possibility of bringing it to eye level and finally-tight to the body, and all the sweat could touch the camera my solution was put through widespread coverage determined (20 grams) on the camera; it takes me a second to download it before the photo And he defends from sweat and other disasters.
Another option I haven't tried is intova's stripe (http://www.intova.net/products/chest-strap/) that costs 20 bucks on B&H and solves the problem of sweat and bruises by placing pads between the chest and the camera. On the other hand, there are straps around the body.
A third solution that I definitely intend to see soon is Keyhole system, built on a suspenders connection * and * belt or waist, and looks very interesting. $ 30 at B&H, or around $ 40 including shipping: http://www.backcountrysolutions.com/id13.html
HarmonicWave  
#9 Posted : Thursday, November 8, 2012 11:54:11 PM(UTC)
HarmonicWave

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 1,143

When I travel with my SLR I use this bag of LOWEPRO-shoulder strap + waist strap.

Pros-good weight distribution and relatively easy, rapid retrieval, good protection for your camera.
Cons-as already stated here: sweating, limited field evidence around the legs. The last problem I get the camera offset by the body in complex technical sections.

BTW-ש"אבל oak wrote about the cameras-even compare! With a compact camera can take great pictures, but it's a different world and whoever SLR photographed with both do not understand how ... Just one example, if you want to print a large image sensor size, then acting serious. "

That sentence less today than in the past. Today a new generation of cameras providing SLR-level results (at least in landscape photos)-irorles cameras such as the Sony NEX series (which I got to play with one of them) and they have other sensors and lenses are excellent quality billets).
Costs are not far from the kit lens with SLR cameras (and sometimes costly it), but the size and weight joy.
Their conspicuous drawback that their projection lenses less successful and dwarf the camera (but this style is less interested in the trip). HarmonicWave 41221.8718171296
איתי  
#10 Posted : Friday, November 9, 2012 11:36:28 AM(UTC)
איתי

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 465

Actually I really hesitated between Mirrorless SLR for when I bought my camera.
These cameras are certainly promising, but there were some things that use the spoon to me.

* While their relatively short battery-because usually occurs by copy the screen (there are several models with digital viewfinder which improves the point)

* The lenses still low-currently primarily affects the mirrorless which booked her hatlbtti (Panasonic G3) + parallel lenses cost almost $ 100 more than I bought Canon.

They have a few drawbacks, but those I comparison against the benefits of their weight and compactness.
a.lidor  
#11 Posted : Friday, November 9, 2012 8:46:04 PM(UTC)
a.lidor

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0

Harmonic Wave, you're absolutely right – I actually looked at this family ש"התפשרתי ago and bought to the HRP Canon G11.
For me it was love at first sight (especially considering that I already had an SLR with lens) and short battery time like me point out though I know this family he trusted too much in a wave.

But in any case not considered as Mirrorless camera compact. Although she doesn't like big SLR body is booming with Tele lens, but is bigger than a compact, it seems to me not neglect.

May that which these types of cameras to catch momentum and cost with improved capabilities (battery, viewfinder etc), it would be a good alternative to the photographer terkist
GibsonLP  
#12 Posted : Friday, November 9, 2012 9:26:34 PM(UTC)
GibsonLP

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 227

As a amateur photographer for years until I had to unfortunately be SLR camera back home shortly after the beginning of the path.
I used the same device with even a little bit bigger than that shown here (I hang out with 5 d mkii and 24-105s).
Photo portfolio just my legs and turned all climbing or descending fun and challenging technical dangerous and scary.
Guest  
#13 Posted : Sunday, November 11, 2012 1:41:04 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 5/6/2016(UTC)
Posts: 7,966

Very similar to the current post:

Http://www.hike.co.il/posts/t66235% d7% a0% d7% a9% d7% 99% d7% 90% d7% aa% d7% a6% d7% 99% d7% 95% d7% 94% d7% a6% d7% 99% d7% 9c% d7% 95% d7% points% d7% 91% d7% a9% d7% 99

Basically, President of camera with two strips attached to the President of the backpack and camera when the camera is connected to the chest.

Maybe contact Ofer-(link name) and build something suitable for you.

סשה1  
#14 Posted : Sunday, November 11, 2012 11:26:36 AM(UTC)
סשה1

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 4

Hello friends
I use a slightly different method than offer me and it works for me: I recently returned from a column Mont Blanc with Canon D550 and 18-135 lens
What I do is simple: I plug the clip that is at the bottom of the camera bag (intended to belt) strips, like that there's a camera on internal security and its anchor to the body, while the upper part of her passing through responsibility heaped on tracks.
Not to say that there were cases that didn't bother me a bit but total good camera sitting, not moving and most importantly was accessible at all times for a quick shot.
ylivny  
#15 Posted : Sunday, November 11, 2012 3:48:00 PM(UTC)
ylivny

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 34

Hello to everyone

At the time I also traveled with an SLR and used to tie her differently.

My camera bag was on the inside sleeve (pretty standard I think). I would dismantle the abdominal belt strap, the bag and slipped off the track.


The result is a camera bag attached to the hip, not hiding it, not cause sweating and yet very accessible.

It looks more or less like this:


Jonathan
יובלש  
#16 Posted : Tuesday, November 13, 2012 11:17:57 AM(UTC)
יובלש

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 328
Israel

[QUOTE = a. lidor] [QUOTE = easyman]

But about the cameras-even compare! With a compact camera can take great pictures, but it's a different world and whoever SLR photographed with both do not understand how ... Just one example, if you want to print a large image sensor size, then acting serious.

One example is weak. Some people really print their photos?

Some of the thousands of pictures you took in printing?

The real advantage of SLR is in optimal lighting conditions and in control of the information (who's interested in it rather than shooting on automatic)

The disadvantage is that each photo has a separate lens. Want to shoot pollen of flowers and eyes of flies? Macro lens picks. Want to photograph birds from tens of feet Carry the lens. Most of the mountains dating not to carry one lens 5-7 pounds of photographic equipment and then compromise on range lens (I have 200-18) that extends the range of uses, but at the same time reduces the early advantage on the SLR has to compactness.

I, after quite a few decisions, went to Alta via with half the old compact Canon S3 and left at the Canon 18-200 lens with 550 that I groaned for Israel. Summary not sorry

99.9% of the images stored on your computer anyway and we want to share the world and this is done through the Internet at piksha, Google + or undertaken Facebook photos are brutal collapse breaks all early advantage was. I look at the pictures I upload path and on images that leaves members with compact cameras and not find some differences.

Not be understood wrong – is a wonderful hobby. And as more sophisticated equipment that results will be better. Just hard to combine it with a hobby of trekking. It also violates the enjoyment of the Trek and harms the photo (because the photo good enough good equipment, need time, we need to focus on the parameters and slammed you on some pass-free at 2700 meters altitude. ' automatic ' and dedicate time to choosing the parameters.)

Just an example of recent shows. On Saturday, a week and a half ago we went for Tel azekah to Beit Guvrin. When we stopped for a short rest in United Kingdom Park saw a man hiding in the bushes with telephoto lens and SLR camera speedily (I think it was at least 400 mm) is probably shoot birds and probably hid in the bushes for half an hour before we arrived and stayed 30 minutes after walking.

I'm sure the pictures are nashinal geographic "' no you can't get just a compact camera to get them he carried equipment at least 4 pounds weight and waited a long time. Just two things you don't want and can't do when you have a scene of 17 miles to go.

Iobelsh 41226.3530671296
easyman  
#17 Posted : Tuesday, November 13, 2012 1:08:16 PM(UTC)
easyman

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0

Iobelsh wrote explaining professionally what I wanted to say .

Indeed, each photo is a hobby and hobby and it also iktzoa and livelihood.

But to trek long and carry photographic equipment and a camera that weighs 5 pounds,

In addition, approximately 15 pounds or more equipment + water and food doesn't look as a combination right?

Each his judgment (beautiful pictures and even awarded compact camera).

But this hobby hobby sometimes toil for him and rolling it iktsoam and source of income. All respect to whoever follows a long trek

If twenty pounds and includes a tent, mattress, ש"קש,, cooking, first aid supplies and equipment, bathing, clothing, food and water, etc. And on top of that camera and tripod and camera equipment.

(Maybe we could improvise a tripod sticks walk taking 3 instead of 2 sticks and improvise connections and save weight).

....... Good luck.

Easyman 41226.5823958333

איתי  
#18 Posted : Wednesday, November 14, 2012 9:41:35 AM(UTC)
איתי

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 465

[QUOTE = easyman]

Iobelsh wrote explaining professionally what I wanted to say .

 



The problem is not with what you wanted to say but its relationship to the question mentioned at the top of the post, it is clear that the traveler with an SLR is aware of the shortcomings and made its considerations before we dated to travel (and I doubt anyone here travels with equipment weighing 5 kg).

What you're trying to say is a bit like trying to convince anyone who travels with a tent it is easy for one to get to travel with camping tent for three persons "that is"

And tell you no more than that, if the primary application of your photos are what Yuval said why are you even taking another camera? The mountains have one (or maybe even two) on a cell phone the way you must take either (if you like the modern equivalent of one session of memorable cameras).
Images from most smartphones in the market they meet all these needs as a compact camera, you "Smart Traveler"? 41227.3005787037 with me
easyman  
#19 Posted : Wednesday, November 14, 2012 10:40:04 AM(UTC)
easyman

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0

TAKE IT EASY rather nice photo hobby and a respectable iktzoa except for the annoyingpress paparazzo freaks?.

Just don't understand about weight and how can carry photographic equipment in the longTrek.

BTW How do you feel about the idea of walking sticks carved from improvisation to take 3 easy מקום2

And immediately save connections.

Easyman 41227.3269907407

GibsonLP  
#20 Posted : Thursday, November 15, 2012 11:02:48 AM(UTC)
GibsonLP

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 227

First 5 kg used either too much with an SLR.
For that matter, my ה5D Mkii combined with 24-105s (not quite compact and easy self) with no case, 2 batteries, charger and memory card weighs 2.2 kg.
About the cimbon of the tripod with 3 sticks-don't think it catches. It may be unstable and I wouldn't leave my gear on.
What I do is connect a flare to the stick and make me onopod. From onopod the stabilization and in conjunction with a camera, positioning (if applicable), high ISO and wide aperture allows the photographer to moonlight without any problem.
In fact, if I'm not mistaken I've seen walking sticks a onopod integrated somewhere.
Users browsing this topic
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.