- Parts of this English version of this website was automatically translated. We are improving the translation every day. Please register to our forum and our hiking expert will love to answer any of your questions there -
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
arthur  
#1 Posted : Saturday, June 13, 2015 3:41:41 PM(UTC)
arthur

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 491

Hello everyone, I want to consult someone about buying a new camera.

Is there anyone on the Forum who understands or who can direct me to the forum more professional?

Want to buy a new camera, what leap Point and shoot got but still won't be too heavy and I don't have to carry some convoluted lenses.

Thanks in advance.

Editing: at first it seems easy search but because the supply is very big in the world of photography quickly lost among all the tchniim concepts.

Edited by user Saturday, June 13, 2015 3:53:13 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Sponsor
HarmonicWave  
#2 Posted : Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:12:18 PM(UTC)
HarmonicWave

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 511

What is the budget?

With what camera you're taking what is currently missing in photo.

There are some premium P & P cameras (and expensive) can be excellent hiking cameras (according to what you say you don't want to get so into a world of changing lenses, hand-held more etc.-correct me if I'm wrong).

arthur  
#3 Posted : Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:22:25 PM(UTC)
arthur

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 491

I started reading some serious audits sites on cams.
But because I don't know the differences in technical data I can only agree with the criticisms when telling me the camera is good.
I also think that POINT AND SHOOT is the best quality tours with lightweight DSLR that obviously heavy and heavy d and MIRRORLESS may need a set of lenses.

Which leaves point & shot cameras and half the so-called professionalism.
The question of what professional half gives and whether it is worth the difference in price and weight.

Considering investing in the $ 1500-2000
I noticed that there are many excellent reviews of Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III but the price is pretty high.
I also see very good reviews (although not as good as the Sony) about the new CANON GX7

Edit: to answer your question, not really missing anything.  But maybe it's because I'm not skilled enough to understand that I not.

I did notice that once that starts to get dark, so my pictures are starting to be very blurred. There is a lot of noise.

I currently shoot with PANASONIC LUMIX DMC ZR3 who was considered pretty good when I bought it 5 years ago.

Edited by user Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:29:37 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

HarmonicWave  
#4 Posted : Saturday, June 13, 2015 9:52:44 PM(UTC)
HarmonicWave

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 511

Check the previous model RX-100 II-now sold around 400 dollars. These days it also was the fourth model, so if not wait some anxious month for prices.

You lose the eyepiece and lens range 28-24-70 100 instead (less and longer focal length wise).

I think we feel a significant improvement in low light compared to your existing camera.

Regardless, it's a good idea to learn to control basic camera parameters can improve results in different situations, as opposed to photo in AUTO.

arthur  
#5 Posted : Saturday, June 13, 2015 11:08:39 PM(UTC)
arthur

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 491

What you have to say about Canon-gx7
arthur  
#6 Posted : Sunday, June 14, 2015 12:00:50 AM(UTC)
arthur

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 491

Also considering I'm at 95 percent. What should I look for in a camera. I guess the focal length and wide.- And as bigger sensor are two important parameters.

Edited by user Sunday, June 14, 2015 12:11:09 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

איתמר  
#7 Posted : Sunday, June 14, 2015 12:36:45 AM(UTC)
איתמר

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0

I have CANON SX40. Great camera. A very serious zoom, excellent picture quality.

HarmonicWave  
#8 Posted : Sunday, June 14, 2015 1:38:16 AM(UTC)
HarmonicWave

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 511

[Quote = arthur; 587132]

Also considering I'm at 95 percent. What should I look for in a camera. I guess the focal length and wide.- And as bigger sensor are two important parameters.

Yes. This wide focal length for landscape photos (Landscape).

Large sensor is good in many ways (dynamic range, low light performance, etc.). In terms of performance and weight the RX 100 win in my opinion.

The G7X is not bad, but its image quality falls a little asoni. However, you may not notice it, and it is cheaper than Sony's third model. Another advantage, Aperture is so closed remains open along the asoni zoom.

If you want to get the budget (as well as some quality), then take a look at Canon S120 (or S110). Even more inexpensive little lens, Aperture 2.0, but a smaller sensor (although still larger than most compact).

I shoot on Indian tours S100. In most cases the limiting factor is the photographer anyway. Note that in all the models, not a zoom for me certainly should be given up for better image quality and weight.

zvikamr  
#9 Posted : Sunday, June 14, 2015 3:32:59 AM(UTC)
zvikamr

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0

You can consult [url = http://www.tapuz.co.il/forums2008/forumpage.aspx? forumid = 809 & r = 1] here [/url]
I'm getting a Sony first model rx100 and very pleased. Also works well in light conditions nothing while staying on the side of the lens.
הלך  
#10 Posted : Sunday, June 14, 2015 7:39:04 AM(UTC)
הלך

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0

יענקל'ה סער  
#11 Posted : Sunday, June 14, 2015 8:54:00 AM(UTC)
YANKALE17

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 3,626
Man
Israel

Best DSLR only they, as is well known, and need corrective lenses.

My NIKKON COOLPIX 500 settlement. Don't think such news (new model)

But there is also a second hand refurbished on EBAY has a one year warranty. 724 g weight pouch included.

Zoom 36 times (it's like 350 mm lens) and that's enough for images that I photograph.

Jonathan2  
#12 Posted : Sunday, June 14, 2015 11:08:37 PM(UTC)
Jonathan2

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0

The new mirrorless give almost identical performance to DSLR in less weight (don't know what the price differences).
If coupled to one large useful lens (optical zoom 20-200 or something like that)
Get a great camera at a relatively low weight.
And without the headache of changing lenses.
Good camera with optical zoom 200, that's something that allows photography of animals and sometimes even birds.
neutrino  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, June 16, 2015 6:30:20 PM(UTC)
neutrino

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 730
Man
Israel
Location: Karmiel

Hello

I went from a DSLR for a MIRRORLESS. I wrote about it in the post. In other words, if you are looking for good quality and relatively small weight (compared to pounds of DSLR) MIRRORLESS interchangeable lens + frame then do the job very nicely around the pounds.
If you want the best quality POCLKETABLE camera-SONY RX100 take version 2 because they reduce 3 angle significant expansion is bad views.

If you want explanations, rather talk on the phone (contact info).

Gregg.
neutrino  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, June 16, 2015 6:33:08 PM(UTC)
neutrino

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 730
Man
Israel
Location: Karmiel

[Quote = Jonathan2; 587176] the new mirrorless give almost identical performance to DSLR in less weight (don't know what the price differences).
If coupled to one large useful lens (optical zoom 20-200 or something like that)
Get a great camera at a relatively low weight.
And without the headache of changing lenses.
Good camera with optical zoom 200, that's something that allows photography of animals and sometimes even birds.

I think it makes no sense to take the soprzom lenses because of their low IQ. If POCKETABLE might. If you are going on about the MIRRORLESS, interchangeable lens or frame so zomim with small range

Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.