- Parts of this English version of this website was automatically translated. We are improving the translation every day. Please register to our forum and our hiking expert will love to answer any of your questions there -
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
omerfly  
#1 Posted : Sunday, November 22, 2015 11:47:49 AM(UTC)
omerfly

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0
Israel

Hi friends.

I want to buy a few cameras and trips the company does.

I came across a camera according to supposed to be good.

Lampert:

Https://www.shep.co.il/d/247/%D7%9E%D7%A6%D7%9C%D7%9E%D7%AA% D7% 90% D7% A7% D7% A1% D7% 99% D7% A8% D7% 99% D7%-points-AEE-S18B 1080 p HD 8MP% D7% 91-349% E2% 82% AA-

Anyone know the company? Experience in their products?

Sponsor
Jonathan2  
#2 Posted : Sunday, November 22, 2015 9:51:03 PM(UTC)
Jonathan2

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0

Are you really asking or that product placement?
Don't see much difference between models of go-Peru-compliant,
I wouldn't take one, but point & shot
omerfly  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, December 8, 2015 1:29:01 AM(UTC)
omerfly

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 0
Israel

What is point & sail Pardon my ignorance.

After wandering at Google saw a positive story about the company but not on the globe ...

There is a competing camera LEGO Peru to provide me the same data channel. Or escape from paying full price for Gu-Peru

יובלש  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, December 9, 2015 10:25:36 AM(UTC)
יובלש

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 328
Israel

Point and whip this basic level of digital cameras.
The photo was made in one of the camera (auto, sport, night, portrait, etc.)
All that's left to do is to point to the object and click the copy button (hence the name point & shot).

Advantages-easy weight, do not require knowledge in photography.
Cons-every kind of camera Smartphone has the same attributes to your point & shot so why invest in something you already have?

Above that there are cameras and SLR-like cameras on it where the body sold separately "ncanot ו"משדכים lenses separately each other dedicated photo mode
As the price rises and also weight and required at least a basic knowledge in photography if not more than that.
But you can get pictures to glory even in low-light conditions.

GO PRO and more at haikoiio photo continuously for still images
Dress her in the head, helmet or (in the case of cyclists) or dedicated shaft
And she cam all the time (or until you turn it off or the battery runs out, the place on the memory card).

Now you set what you want and that you choose.
imtl  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, December 9, 2015 11:55:53 AM(UTC)
imtl

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 960
Man
New Zealand

[Quote = iobelsh; 590223]

Advantages-easy weight, do not require knowledge in photography.
Cons-today all unlocked camera has pretty much the same point and shot camera characteristics so why invest in something you already have?

Yuval

I don't agree with what you wrote that all have the same Smartphone camera point and whip. Maybe point & shot costs 100 weight but

It's not point & shot/shot tho but point and de garbag.

PNS cameras can be very serious and quite high. I can vouch for what I have and what I can get.

No unlocked within years to be able to get to it.

arthur  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, December 9, 2015 1:33:30 PM(UTC)
arthur

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 491

Why do people think that cameras are good style of Gu-trails Peru That is just not true.

I say this as a user go Peru.
יובלש  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, December 9, 2015 1:37:11 PM(UTC)
יובלש

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 328
Israel

[Quote = imtl; 590224]

[Quote = iobelsh; 590223]

Advantages-easy weight, do not require knowledge in photography.
Cons-today all unlocked camera has pretty much the same point and shot camera characteristics so why invest in something you already have?

Yuval

I don't agree with what you wrote that all have the same Smartphone camera point and whip. Maybe point & shot costs 100 weight but

It's not point & shot/shot tho but point and de garbag.

PNS cameras can be very serious and quite high. I can vouch for what I have and what I can get.

No unlocked within years to be able to get to it.

You probably don't. אייפון6 and גלאקסי6 also have cameras.

I attach a review. Although it compares 2 Smartphone cameras but the summary paragraph has digital cameras either standard reference

Smartphone cameras

And I will add some more.

16 Megapixel is not the most p & s cameras and allows reasonable quality print, good.

This HDR photography at a very successful feature which is not present in many p & s cameras

Self-timer (Salafist in the parlance) is very simple to perform in a unlocked and very complicated digital cameras (of all kinds) and requires the use of a timer, etc.

What you get from your camera-good image that said 90% of the photographer and 10%. Get a great photographer too simple camera picture who doesn't know poop pictures taken with any SLR that cost 8 fresh pastas.

If you want to really delve into reading the article.

Article

(If you don't have the time just look at pictures of the milky way that guy was shot with Sony's Smartphone.)

Edited by user Wednesday, December 9, 2015 1:46:51 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

יובלש  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, December 9, 2015 2:02:16 PM(UTC)
יובלש

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 328
Israel

[Quote = arthur; 590225] why do people think style cameras of Goo good trails Peru? That is just not true.


I say this as a user go Peru.

1. because it's considered COOL

2. because it's the only option to shoot video (smartphones and digital cameras have a time limit on the duration of the photo).

3. you can shoot without using hands (so called photo POV).

4. because it is lightweight even for most small cameras and much more resistant to shocks and shaking bad weather.

And still, you're right. It is less suitable for hikers and more suitable for cyclists, climbers, divers etc.

Even on Wikipedia the use case-trekking Peru doesn't exist.

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

imtl  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, December 9, 2015 2:09:36 PM(UTC)
imtl

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 960
Man
New Zealand

[Quote = iobelsh; 590226]

[Quote = imtl; 590224]

[Quote = iobelsh; 590223]

Advantages-easy weight, do not require knowledge in photography.
Cons-today all unlocked camera has pretty much the same point and shot camera characteristics so why invest in something you already have?

Yuval

I don't agree with what you wrote that all have the same Smartphone camera point and whip. Maybe point & shot costs 100 weight but

It's not point & shot/shot tho but point and de garbag.

PNS cameras can be very serious and quite high. I can vouch for what I have and what I can get.

No unlocked within years to be able to get to it.

You probably don't. אייפון6 and גלאקסי6 also have cameras.

I attach a review. Although it compares 2 Smartphone cameras but the summary paragraph has digital cameras either standard reference

Smartphone cameras

And I will add some more.

16 Megapixel is not the most p & s cameras and allows reasonable quality print, good.

This HDR photography at a very successful feature which is not present in many p & s cameras

Self-timer (Salafist in the parlance) is very simple to perform in a unlocked and very complicated digital cameras (of all kinds) and requires the use of a timer, etc.

What you get from your camera-good image that said 90% of the photographer and 10%. Get a great photographer too simple camera picture who doesn't know poop pictures taken with any SLR that cost 8 fresh pastas.

If you want to really delve into reading the article.

Article

(If you don't have the time just look at pictures of the milky way that guy was shot with Sony's Smartphone.)

Thank you Yuval.

I'm not updated in the world of smart phones too, but read what you gave links including blog favorite guy with the milky way. And here's my opinion:

Also in paragraph pointing to the end of the link about compared to pocket cameras (PnS) explicitly says that Smartphone cameras zoom in on certain characteristics

To PnS, but of course not zoom and the size of the sensor (forgot also indicate that it means in optics and in the heart of the detector). I mean, there's 16 Megapixel isn't exactly a picture quality that you receive. This is the weakest. There are also lots of PnS cameras with 16 megapixels. So what I wrote just isn't true. Are they cheap? Don't. But also the new generation of smartphones not just sold in the Carmel market in 9.99. Right?

Ditto for HDR that is almost standard in PnS cameras and Salafist. lots of cameras come with a folding screen that this argument is irrelevant. (I'm not talking about cameras in 100 shekels)

About guy's blog. He used a nice software that gave him control of all of the software that is provided as the ISO and shutter speed. But when it comes to optics and sensor so he really what to do. And his pictures of shocking their quality. So I don't see where to place here. I can send you my picture of PnS or Aurora and see the differences. There is no comparison.

Without defending myself in any way I totally agree with what you wrote about how photography is mostly the photographer rather than the device. Whoever understands deeply the concepts (and physics if he/she wants) so you can get a simple camera what most people can't get sophisticated cameras.

So I think photographing with this Smartphone can be a great solution for those who just want to seize the moment in the picture without importance to how it looks and it looks good too many cases even very good. But once you want Photo photo, bad lighting or anything that exceeds the templates you find gaps just.

Edited by user Wednesday, December 9, 2015 7:14:57 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

יובלש  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, December 9, 2015 2:52:18 PM(UTC)
יובלש

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 328
Israel

[Quote = imtl; 590228]

[Quote = iobelsh; 590226]

[Quote = imtl; 590224]

[Quote = iobelsh; 590223]

Advantages-easy weight, do not require knowledge in photography.
Cons-today all unlocked camera has pretty much the same point and shot camera characteristics so why invest in something you already have?

Yuval

I don't agree with what you wrote that all have the same Smartphone camera point and whip. Maybe point & shot costs 100 weight but

It's not point & shot/shot tho but point and de garbag.

PNS cameras can be very serious and quite high. I can vouch for what I have and what I can get.

No unlocked within years to be able to get to it.

You probably don't. אייפון6 and גלאקסי6 also have cameras.

I attach a review. Although it compares 2 Smartphone cameras but the summary paragraph has digital cameras either standard reference

Smartphone cameras

And I will add some more.

16 Megapixel is not the most p & s cameras and allows reasonable quality print, good.

This HDR photography at a very successful feature which is not present in many p & s cameras

Self-timer (Salafist in the parlance) is very simple to perform in a unlocked and very complicated digital cameras (of all kinds) and requires the use of a timer, etc.

What you get from your camera-good image that said 90% of the photographer and 10%. Get a great photographer too simple camera picture who doesn't know poop pictures taken with any SLR that cost 8 fresh pastas.

If you want to really delve into reading the article.

Article

(If you don't have the time just look at pictures of the milky way that guy was shot with Sony's Smartphone.)

Thank you Yuval.

I'm not updated in the world of smart phones too, but read what you gave links including blog favorite guy with the milky way. And here's my opinion:

Also in paragraph pointing to the end of the link about compared to pocket cameras (PnS) explicitly says that Smartphone cameras zoom in on certain characteristics

To PnS, but of course not zoom and the size of the sensor (forgot also indicate that it means in optics and in the heart of the detector). I mean, there's 16 Megapixel isn't exactly a picture quality that you receive. This is the weakest. There are also lots of PnS cameras with 16 megapixels. So what I wrote just isn't true. Are they cheap? Don't. But also the new generation of smartphones not just sold in the Carmel market in 9.99. Right?

Ditto for HDR that is almost standard in PnS cameras and Salafist. lots of cameras come with a folding screen that this argument is irrelevant. (I'm not talking about cameras in 100 shekels)

About guy's blog. He used a nice software that gave him control of all of the software that is provided as the ISO and shutter speed. But when it comes to optics and sensor so he really what to do. And his pictures of shocking their quality. So I don't see where to place here. I can send you my picture of PnS or Aurora and see the differences. There is no comparison.

Without defending yourself in any way, I completely agree with your statement that a photograph and photographer. Whoever understands deeply the concepts (and physics if he/she wants) so you can get a simple camera what most people can't get sophisticated cameras.

So I think photographing with this Smartphone can be a great solution for those who just want to seize the moment in the picture without importance to how it looks and it looks good too many cases even very good. But once you want Photo photo, bad lighting or anything that exceeds the templates you find gaps just.

Thank you too for your comments.

I think you kind of radicalization in the first reaction when you wrote "will take years"

And I may need the ktsnati pblovit response to the other side as I said already, there is no difference.

The truth is somewhere in the middle (as always, no?)

arthur  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, December 9, 2015 4:16:19 PM(UTC)
arthur

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 491

[Quote = iobelsh; 590227]

[Quote = arthur; 590225] why do people think style cameras of Goo good trails Peru? That is just not true.


I say this as a user go Peru.

1. because it's considered COOL

2. because it's the only option to shoot video (smartphones and digital cameras have a time limit on the duration of the photo).

3. you can shoot without using hands (so called photo POV).

4. because it is lightweight even for most small cameras and much more resistant to shocks and shaking bad weather.

And still, you're right. It is less suitable for hikers and more suitable for cyclists, climbers, divers etc.

Even on Wikipedia the use case-trekking Peru doesn't exist.

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1. agrees that it is considered sound.

2. the only option to shoot video? My digital camera has HD video and photography without limitation and many more such cameras

3. Yes you can shoot without hands but we need to invest in more dedicated equipment and you don't know what you're taking.  My computer still have a few hours of photography mainly see my nose since I flew to climb in Italy a few years ago. It turns out that the camera was pointed too low.

Nature hike on most days (95% of the time), and we still. The benefits of the cameras so extreme neglect.

If there's one thing that I trust him and I say this in several forums for a while-that benefits the cameras extreme are expressed solely in the action in which there is no alternative.

In any other situation I would like to see what I'm getting to do kopositia, play with light and shadow, single object, and a simple picture language. All about pieces of class up of professional photography. Just wanting to know what I'm getting what I got.

With my camera go Peru took hours and hours of climbing, rock and ice and out of all the videos I could edit and keep 30 percent. Which is good, why? Because there was another option that my hands were busy.  If I was unable to connect my helmet DSLR and dwarf services sitting on my neck and take great pictures would do it.

imtl  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, December 9, 2015 7:13:12 PM(UTC)
imtl

Rank: Newbie

Groups: חבר
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 960
Man
New Zealand

[Quote = iobelsh; 590230]

Thank you too for your comments.

I think you kind of radicalization in the first reaction when you wrote "will take years"

And I may need the ktsnati pblovit response to the other side as I said already, there is no difference.

The truth is somewhere in the middle (as always, no?)

Yuval. Because even the Father Jean a piece of what's happening in the world of smartphones. I'm sure Saturday will double. She always asks me to try to play.

With its Smartphone camera so she can take more interesting photos. The software opens up options for controlling the camera.

It's a great thing. I look at it in depth. So thanks!

About to be years. So because I don't really know the subject deeply enough so if you have an idea of what level of optics instruments

These (that is technically what it contains) would love to get private messages to steal more than thread.

The truth is always in interesting discussions and Purim.

אמנון לנגי  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, December 9, 2015 7:33:24 PM(UTC)
amnonl

Rank: Newbie

Groups: מנהל כללי
Joined: 5/15/2016(UTC)
Posts: 1,948
Man
Israel
Location: ירקונה

Nice to see the aglianit dialectics in some discussions.
You know, thesis, antithesis and synthesis in the end.
The only way to progress is achieved.
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.